Hírolvasó
The effect of maternal health service utilization in early initiation of breastfeeding among Nepalese mothers
Prevalence and associated factors of breastfeeding in women with gestational diabetes in a University Hospital in Thailand
Correlates of exclusive breastfeeding practices in rural and urban Niger: a community-based cross-sectional study
Mammary Dysbiosis and Nipple Blebs Treated With Intravenous Daptomycin and Dalbavancin
Introduction:Mammary dysbiosis, also known as subacute mastitis, may be associated with nipple blebs. These overlapping diagnoses represent a challenging clinical scenario during lactation. Little research has been published on etiology, management strategies, and outcomes of these concurrent diagnoses.Main issue:We document the treatment and outcome of a patient who presented with left-breast dysbiosis and nipple blebs and whose milk culture grew multi-drug-resistant, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. She was treated safely and effectively with intravenous daptomycin and dalbavancin. This has not been described previously in the lactation literature.Management:The 35-year-old lactating gravida 3, para 3 patient presented at 6 months postpartum to a breast surgery clinic with a 1-week history of worsening deep left-breast pain, blebs, and recurrent plugging. She was afebrile and she had no erythema or induration on her breast exam. A culture of her milk grew multi-drug-resistant, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and she was referred to infectious disease for assistance with intravenous antibiotic therapy. She continued to feed expressed milk throughout treatment and demonstrated complete resolution of symptoms 8 weeks later.Conclusions:We report that in patients with a multi-drug-resistant, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus–positive human milk culture and a clinical presentation of mammary dysbiosis and nipple blebs, intravenous daptomycin and dalbavancin may be an effective treatment.
Mammary Dysbiosis and Nipple Blebs Treated With Intravenous Daptomycin and Dalbavancin
Introduction:Mammary dysbiosis, also known as subacute mastitis, may be associated with nipple blebs. These overlapping diagnoses represent a challenging clinical scenario during lactation. Little research has been published on etiology, management strategies, and outcomes of these concurrent diagnoses.Main issue:We document the treatment and outcome of a patient who presented with left-breast dysbiosis and nipple blebs and whose milk culture grew multi-drug-resistant, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. She was treated safely and effectively with intravenous daptomycin and dalbavancin. This has not been described previously in the lactation literature.Management:The 35-year-old lactating gravida 3, para 3 patient presented at 6 months postpartum to a breast surgery clinic with a 1-week history of worsening deep left-breast pain, blebs, and recurrent plugging. She was afebrile and she had no erythema or induration on her breast exam. A culture of her milk grew multi-drug-resistant, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and she was referred to infectious disease for assistance with intravenous antibiotic therapy. She continued to feed expressed milk throughout treatment and demonstrated complete resolution of symptoms 8 weeks later.Conclusions:We report that in patients with a multi-drug-resistant, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus–positive human milk culture and a clinical presentation of mammary dysbiosis and nipple blebs, intravenous daptomycin and dalbavancin may be an effective treatment.
Supporting Women From the Travelling Community in Ireland to Breastfeed: Overcoming the Challenges of High-risk Screening for Classical Galactosaemia
The development and evaluation of a picture tongue assessment tool for tongue-tie in breastfed babies (TABBY)
Determinants of exclusive breastfeeding among mothers of infants aged 6 to 12 months in Gwanda District, Zimbabwe
The association between work related factors and breastfeeding practices among Chinese working mothers: a mixed-method approach
Exclusive breastfeeding practices in an urban settlement of Vellore, southern India: findings from the MAL-ED birth cohort
Understanding the Challenges of Induction of Lactation and Relactation for Non-Gestating Spanish Mothers
Background:Induced lactation and relactation are the processes that enable breastfeeding in non-gestating mothers.Research aim:The aim of this study was to describe and interpret the challenges faced by mothers who undergo induced breastfeeding and relactation for adopted infants, infants born via surrogacy, and infants born to same-sex female partners.Methods:A qualitative study was performed using in-depth interviews conducted with Spanish women (N = 9) who had decided to undergo induced lactation or relactation. The data were collected between October 2014 and May 2017. The length of the study was due to the difficulty in locating and recruiting the sample. Interviews were transcribed and coded with the ATLAS.ti v.7.5.7 software. We performed a deductive thematic analysis, creating categories based on the interview questions, which we developed on the basis of previous literature about induced lactation and relactation.Results:Participants described the following challenges: the physical hardships of the process; breastfeeding problems; difficulty with accessing information about induced lactation or relactation; and lack of support from health professionals. Breastfeeding periods lasted from 1.5 months to 4 years. Participants reported that breastfeeding increased the closeness between the mother and child and that this feeling of closeness tended to decrease after breastfeeding cessation.Conclusion:We offer data and analysis that can improve our understanding of the lived experiences of women undergoing the process of relactation or induced lactation and may help guide intervention strategies to support women in this situation.
Understanding the Challenges of Induction of Lactation and Relactation for Non-Gestating Spanish Mothers
Background:Induced lactation and relactation are the processes that enable breastfeeding in non-gestating mothers.Research aim:The aim of this study was to describe and interpret the challenges faced by mothers who undergo induced breastfeeding and relactation for adopted infants, infants born via surrogacy, and infants born to same-sex female partners.Methods:A qualitative study was performed using in-depth interviews conducted with Spanish women (N = 9) who had decided to undergo induced lactation or relactation. The data were collected between October 2014 and May 2017. The length of the study was due to the difficulty in locating and recruiting the sample. Interviews were transcribed and coded with the ATLAS.ti v.7.5.7 software. We performed a deductive thematic analysis, creating categories based on the interview questions, which we developed on the basis of previous literature about induced lactation and relactation.Results:Participants described the following challenges: the physical hardships of the process; breastfeeding problems; difficulty with accessing information about induced lactation or relactation; and lack of support from health professionals. Breastfeeding periods lasted from 1.5 months to 4 years. Participants reported that breastfeeding increased the closeness between the mother and child and that this feeling of closeness tended to decrease after breastfeeding cessation.Conclusion:We offer data and analysis that can improve our understanding of the lived experiences of women undergoing the process of relactation or induced lactation and may help guide intervention strategies to support women in this situation.
Breastfeeding Duration and Infant Sleep Location in a Cohort of Volunteer Breastfeeding Counselors
Background:Debate about mother and infant bed sharing has been polarized between supporters of bed sharing and public health policies that attempt to mitigate the risk of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome. Differences in group demographics may be an important aspect in co-sleeping acceptability.Research aims:The first aim of this study was to investigate infant sleeping location in a dataset of mothers with strong breastfeeding outcomes. The second aim was to investigate the association between infant sleeping location and breastfeeding (exclusive breastfeeding to 6 months and total breastfeeding duration). Finally, we aimed to investigate predictors of breastfeeding duration.Methods:Participants comprised 174 women who had applied to train as counselors with the Australian Breastfeeding Association. Data were compiled from a survey of the participants’ lactation histories, including questions related to the exclusivity and duration of breastfeeding, concerns about and problems encountered during breastfeeding, type of birth, medications during birth, demographics, and infant sleeping location. The study design was a cross-sectional, one-group survey design.Results:A high proportion of participants in this study bed shared and room shared: At 0–1 month (n = 58), 33% of participants bed-shared, which increased to 58% by 6–12 months (n = 80). Infants who co-slept were more likely to be exclusively breastfed at 6 months (χ2 (2, n = 116) = 4.83, p = .03) and had longer breastfeeding duration (t (62.61) = 3.81, p < .001).Conclusions:Breastfeeding targets have been difficult to achieve globally, and innovative ideas are required to improve breastfeeding outcomes through public health messaging. There was a strong association in the current study between breastfeeding outcomes and degree of closeness of the infant to the mother at night. This finding should be brought into the discourse on breastfeeding and infant sleep arrangements, accompanied by evidence-based advice about safe sleeping and the promotion of breastfeeding.
Breastfeeding Duration and Infant Sleep Location in a Cohort of Volunteer Breastfeeding Counselors
Background:Debate about mother and infant bed sharing has been polarized between supporters of bed sharing and public health policies that attempt to mitigate the risk of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome. Differences in group demographics may be an important aspect in co-sleeping acceptability.Research aims:The first aim of this study was to investigate infant sleeping location in a dataset of mothers with strong breastfeeding outcomes. The second aim was to investigate the association between infant sleeping location and breastfeeding (exclusive breastfeeding to 6 months and total breastfeeding duration). Finally, we aimed to investigate predictors of breastfeeding duration.Methods:Participants comprised 174 women who had applied to train as counselors with the Australian Breastfeeding Association. Data were compiled from a survey of the participants’ lactation histories, including questions related to the exclusivity and duration of breastfeeding, concerns about and problems encountered during breastfeeding, type of birth, medications during birth, demographics, and infant sleeping location. The study design was a cross-sectional, one-group survey design.Results:A high proportion of participants in this study bed shared and room shared: At 0–1 month (n = 58), 33% of participants bed-shared, which increased to 58% by 6–12 months (n = 80). Infants who co-slept were more likely to be exclusively breastfed at 6 months (χ2 (2, n = 116) = 4.83, p = .03) and had longer breastfeeding duration (t (62.61) = 3.81, p < .001).Conclusions:Breastfeeding targets have been difficult to achieve globally, and innovative ideas are required to improve breastfeeding outcomes through public health messaging. There was a strong association in the current study between breastfeeding outcomes and degree of closeness of the infant to the mother at night. This finding should be brought into the discourse on breastfeeding and infant sleep arrangements, accompanied by evidence-based advice about safe sleeping and the promotion of breastfeeding.
The financing need for expanded maternity protection in Indonesia
Ensuring Health for All: ILCA President, Mudiwah Kadeshe, shares at Women Deliver
Nyári piknik az érdligeti játszótéren
Egész nap egyedül vagy otthon a picivel? Jó lenne pár órára kimozdulni? Társaságot keresel a gyermekednek? Kérdéseid vannak vagy csak szeretnél kicsit beszélgetni?
Gyere az érdligeti nagy játszótérre, és tölts velünk 1-2 órát! Találkozz hasonló élethelyzetben lévő szülőkkel, tedd fel kérdéseidet a jelenlévő szoptatási és hordozási tanácsadó, védőnő, valamint perinatális szaktanácsadó szakembereknek.
Hozz egészséges harapnivalókat, oszd meg a többiekkel bevált receptjeidet!
Nyáron kéthetente szerdán várunk 10-12 óra között!
Dátumok:
- július 3.
- július 17.
- július 31.
- augusztus 14.
- augusztus 28.
Kép forrása: Pixabay
judit 2019. 06. 20., cs – 14:27 Tags ProgramokNyári piknik az érdligeti játszótéren
Egész nap egyedül vagy otthon a picivel? Jó lenne pár órára kimozdulni? Társaságot keresel a gyermekednek? Kérdéseid vannak vagy csak szeretnél kicsit beszélgetni?
Gyere az érdligeti nagy játszótérre, és tölts velünk 1-2 órát! Találkozz hasonló élethelyzetben lévő szülőkkel, tedd fel kérdéseidet a jelenlévő szoptatási és hordozási tanácsadó, védőnő, valamint perinatális szaktanácsadó szakembereknek.
Hozz egészséges harapnivalókat, oszd meg a többiekkel bevált receptjeidet!
Nyáron kéthetente szerdán várunk 10-12 óra között!
Dátumok:
- július 3.
- július 17.
- július 31.
- augusztus 14.
- augusztus 28.
Kép forrása: Pixabay
judit 2019. 06. 20., cs – 14:27 Tags ProgramokMain Barriers to Optimal Breastfeeding Practices in Armenia: A Qualitative Study
Background:In 2015, the median duration of exclusive breastfeeding was 2.2 months in Armenia, and only 15% of 4–5-month-old children were exclusively breastfed, indicating an issue with breastfeeding knowledge and practices.Research aim:To identify the main barriers to optimal breastfeeding practices in Armenia.Methods:We used qualitative research methods via focus group discussions and in-depth interviews with four groups of providers from different levels of care, and mothers of young children, from Yerevan city and two provinces, Lori and Shirak. Overall, eight in-depth interviews and 13 focus group discussions were conducted with a total of 99 participants. Qualitative content analysis was applied, with elements of both inductive and deductive approaches.Results:We identified two main categories of barriers to optimal breastfeeding—systemic barriers and knowledge deficiencies. The main themes within systemic barriers were lack of skilled breastfeeding support services and low motivation of providers—mainly related to inadequate recognition of their role in breastfeeding counseling and low remuneration. The main knowledge-related barriers were insufficient counseling of mothers, lack of reliable information sources about infant feeding, and misconceptions among both mothers and providers.Conclusion:Optimal breastfeeding is crucial for the best start to an infant’s life; however, there were a number of barriers to optimal breastfeeding practices in Armenia. Our findings and recommendations could help policymakers apply effective strategies for improving breastfeeding rates in Armenia. Considering the similar historical backgrounds of the post-Soviet countries, our findings could also be applicable to other Commonwealth of Independent States countries.