Hírolvasó
Building a Policy: Ten Steps to a Breastfeeding-Friendly Shelter
Stability of the Antimicrobial Capacity of Human Milk Against Cronobacter Sakazakii During Handling
BackgroundNeonatal infections with Cronobacter sakazakii have recently been associated with the consumption of expressed human milk.Study Aims(1) To evaluate whether human milk has antimicrobial capacity against C. sakazakii and (2) to determine the stability of its capacity when it is subjected to various treatments.MethodsThe antimicrobial capacity of human milk against C. sakazakii was evaluated using an observational, cross-sectional, comparative design. Mature human milk samples (N = 29) were subjected to different treatments. After incubation at 37°C for 72 hr, samples were compared with fresh milk on the stability of their antimicrobial capacity. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed.ResultsIn fresh milk, counts of C. sakazakii were reduced by 47.26% (SD = 6.74) compared to controls. In treated milk, reductions were: refrigeration at 4°C for 72 hr (M = 33.84, SD = 13.84), freezing at –20°C for 1, 2, and 3 months (M = 40.31, SD = 9.10; M = 35.96, SD = 9.39; M = 26.20, SD = 13.55, respectively), Holder pasteurization (M = 23.56, SD = 15.61), and human milk bank treatment with (M = 14.37, SD = 18.02) and without bovine fortifier (M = 3.70, SD = 23.83). There were significant differences (p < .05) between fresh and treated milk.ConclusionsHuman milk has antimicrobial capacity against C. sakazakii. However, its capacity is negatively influenced by common preservation and hygienization methods. Milk should be stored refrigerated for a maximum of 72 hr or frozen for a short period of time.
A Call to Ensure Access to Human Milk for Vulnerable Infants During the COVID-19 Epidemic
Community Perspectives During a Lead Contaminated Drinking Water Crisis: Lessons for Lactation and Other Health Providers
BackgroundMillions of people today live in contaminated environments. Often, these environments disproportionately affect nonwhite, racialized families who are low-income, pregnant, and/or feeding young children. Despite the overwhelming recognition among scholars and practitioners of these realities, however, few lactation or other health professionals center socially disadvantaged families’ perspectives in their work. Community expertise is therefore often absent from the credentialed lactation and associated support that tends to be advanced in contaminated environments.Research AimsThe aims of this study were to: (1) Describe how vulnerable community members experience toxic environments, and (2) Explore the strategies vulnerable community members themselves employ and seek out from professionals to achieve resilience in these environments.MethodsThe research design for this study was prospective and cross-sectional. We surveyed 62 Milwaukeean African American women of childbearing age and their close networks of support from predominantly low-income census tracts, and we engaged 14 women in a community conversation on their experiences, strategies, and desires generated from living in Milwaukee during a lead contaminated drinking water crisis.ResultsParticipants were aware and concerned about toxic poisoning in their environment, especially as it affects their children. Nonetheless, societal factors constrained their levels of preparedness and action in response, including around chestfeeding, breastfeeding, expressed milk feeding, and artificial feeding methods.ConclusionLactation providers and other health professionals can better support at-risk families by integrating their perspectives into dominant frameworks for information-sharing, preventative resource distribution, and supporting community self-determination.
Examining working mothers’ experience of exclusive breastfeeding in Ghana
Effects of perinatal factors on sirtuin 3, 8-hydroxy-2′- deoxyguanosine, brain-derived neurotrophic factor and serotonin in cord blood and early breast milk: an observational study
Being There: The Development of the International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes, the Innocenti Declaration and the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative
Margaret Isabirye Kyenkya (photo) grew up in Uganda with five bothers and six sisters. Her Bachelor of Arts was in Social Work and Social Administration (Makerere University, Uganda), and was followed by a Masters in Sociology, (Nairobi University), and a Certificate in Mother and Child Health (International Child Health Institute, London). Her PhD focused on Hospital Administration inspired by the WHO/UNICEF Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative. She has worked as a researcher, the founder of Non-Governmental Organizations, a Senior United Nations Officer (New York Headquarters and several regions), a Manager in the United States Agency for International Development-funded National Health and Nutrition Projects, and a governmental Health and Nutrition Adviser. A certified trainer in a number of health and nutrition areas, a breastfeeding counselor, and a retired La Leche League Leader, Dr. Kyenkya has significantly influenced the course of lactation support and promotion globally. She stated, “My most precious and valued occupation is that of a mother [of five] and grandmother [of eight].” Dr. Kyenkya currently lives in Atlanta, Georgia, in the United States. (This interview was conducted in-person and transcribed verbatim. It has been edited for ease of readability. MK refers to Margaret Kyenkya; KM refers to Kathleen Marinelli.)
Relationship between maternal body mass index with the onset of breastfeeding and its associated problems: an online survey
Myth or Fact: Never Wake a Sleeping Baby
When it comes to sleep and babies, parents often get conflicting advice. Should a sleeping baby be awakened every few hours to nurse? If a baby begins sleeping longer stretches, is pumping necessary to maintain milk production? As with many baby-care questions, the answer is “it depends.”
When babies sleep for long stretches, several factors influence the best course of action: your comfort, baby’s age, and baby’s growth. Some common practices may also affect these decisions. Let’s start with the basics.
Your Comfort
No matter what is going on with your sleeping baby, if you wake up feeling uncomfortably full of milk, it’s time to take action. Go ahead and nurse. You can do this without fully awakening your baby by encouraging what’s called a “dream feed.” This means stimulating your baby just enough during light sleep (eyes moving under eyelids, any body movement) to latch and nurse but not so much that she is wide awake. After dream feeds, babies usually continue sleeping. This kind of turnabout is fair play, as baby likely wakes you when she needs to nurse. The longer unrelieved breast fullness continues, the greater the risk you’ll develop a problem, such as plugged ducts or mastitis. Your health is important, too!
Baby’s Age and Weight
In addition to your needs, are there times when—for baby’s sake—you should awaken a sleeping baby to feed? Yes. Most often, this need arises during the early weeks.
Early weight loss and gain. After birth, nursing babies commonly lose up to 10% of birth weight,[1] with the lowest weight occurring on Day 3 or 4. From that point on, babies gain on average about 1 oz. (30 g) per day until they reach 3 or 4 months of age, when weight gain naturally slows.[2] It’s a good sign if baby is back to birth weight by 2 weeks, but some well babies may take longer than this. Most health organizations recommend babies see their healthcare provider for weight checks within a day or two after hospital discharge and again at around 2 weeks. Weight gain is the most reliable gauge of how nursing is going.
The first 2 weeks are like a “trial period,” when it’s a good idea to keep a close eye on the nursing baby. This usually involves weight checks, tracking number of nursing sessions per 24 hours and diaper output. If baby is not gaining weight as expected or has a weight loss of more than 10% of birth weight, it’s time to see a lactation specialist to determine the cause. In some cases, this is unrelated to nursing (see HERE). But it may happen if a baby spends too much time sleeping and not enough time nursing. An overdressed or swaddled baby may become too warm (for more on swaddling, click HERE), which increases sleepiness (use adult clothing weight as a guide for baby). Some newborns don’t nurse effectively due to a shallow latch or other issues, which can contribute to both weight-gain issues and nipple pain in the nursing parent. When an ineffective baby’s resulting calorie intake is too low, this not only causes weight issues, it saps her energy, causing excessively sleepiness.
Between these early weight checks, what are some signs baby needs to be awakened to nurse?
Number of nursing sessions per day: Make sure baby nurses at least 8 times each day (more is even better). Ignore the time intervals between feeds, focusing instead on each 24-hour period. Some thriving newborns sleep for one 4- to 5-hour stretch but still fit in at least 8 feeds by bunching their feeds close together, nursing like crazy while they’re awake (cluster feed). This pattern is common during the first 40 days.[3]
Dirty diapers. Changes in stool color are a reliable sign of adequate milk intake during the first week.[4] If nursing is going well, stools change from black to greenish by around Day 3 and to yellow or brown by Day 4 or 5. If stools stay black and tarry after Day 5, it’s time to contact baby’s healthcare provider to get baby weighed and evaluated. After stools turn yellow, 3 to 4 or more stools per day is a rough indicator baby is getting enough milk, which creates the stools and puts on weight.
If a sleepy newborn does not fit in at least 8 nursing sessions per day, stool color does not change when expected, or baby’s weight is of concern, it makes sense to wake her to fit in more feeds and seek lactation help. When it is difficult to wake baby to feed actively at least 8 times per day, it is time to contact baby’s healthcare provider.
As the months pass, baby may begin sleeping for longer stretches. As her tummy grows, she can hold more milk. Some babies continue to gain weight as expected on fewer feeds per day. Others need the same number of nursing sessions to grow and thrive.[5]
Even if your baby begins sleeping for longer stretches, don’t expect this to continue. With babies and sleep, it’s often two steps forward and one step back. The baby who was sleeping for 5 or 6 hours at night at 3 months is often the same baby who wakes frequently again for night feeds when teething starts and developmental changes (like rolling over, crawling, and walking) occur.
Is it necessary after the newborn stage to wake a baby to nurse? Assuming you’re comfortable, it all depends on how she’s doing. If baby is gaining weight as expected, no need to make any changes. If not, more feeds are likely needed. In some cases, nursing more often during the day might be enough for a baby to get the milk she needs. But if you have what’s called a “small storage capacity” (explained HERE), going for too long between milk removals (nursing or pumping) at night may slow milk production. Getting a sense of your own “magic number” (the number of milk removals per day needed to keep production steady, also explained on the link in the previous sentence) is vital to meeting your long-term feeding goals.[6]
Common Practices to Consider
Some nursing parents worry that if their baby sleeps for too long at night, this might decrease their milk production. But when they are responsive to baby’s cues, if milk production decreases, most babies will simply cue to feed more often to get the milk they need, which also stimulates ample milk production. In short: if you continue to feed your baby on cue, day and night rather than following a feeding schedule (even a loose schedule), extra pumping should not be necessary to maintain milk production. However, some common baby-care practices may interfere with this automatic demand-and-supply regulation of milk-making and cause a decrease production and infant weight gain. Unlike other mammal species, with our large brains, it is not only possible to overthink lactation, we can also be convinced to inadvertently thwart our biology.
Night weaning and sleep training. Making ample milk for our baby (even twins and triplets) is something that usually happens automatically when a baby nurses effectively and nursing parents are responsive to baby’s feeding cues. Even during the newborn stage, however, some baby-care authors advise parents to disregard human physiology and feed babies on a strict schedule, which the American Academy of Pediatrics linked to increased risk of dehydration and slow weight gain.[7] Other authors advise parents to night wean or use sleep-training methods to reduce infant night-waking. These practices involve being less responsive to baby’s feeding cues at night.
These methods may temporarily reduce baby’s night-waking, but they often need to be repeated multiple times as baby enters different stages of growth and development. In addition to being stressful for many nursing parents, depending on their storage capacity, milk production (and baby’s growth) may be compromised as nursing sessions are eliminated. When milk production is no longer automatically regulated by the baby, these practices may prevent families from meeting their long-term feeding goals.
When parents struggle to deal with night-waking, there are alternatives to these practices. An Australian study found that parents were better able to cope with infant night-waking when they learned about infant-sleeping norms and received support.[8] To learn about infant sleeping norms, a good place to start is the free Infant Sleep Info app (details HERE) created by UK infant-sleep researchers at the University of Durham. With this app, parents can chart their baby’s sleep patterns and compare them with other babies their age.
Bottle-feeding and baby’s sleep patterns. Many nursing babies are also bottle-fed occasionally, partially, or exclusively. Depending on how it’s done, bottle-feeding may either reinforce healthy nursing and sleeping patterns or distort them. If paced bottle-feeding techniques (described HERE) are used, this creates an ebb and flow of milk during feeds similar to nursing that helps prevent overfeeding. Bottle-feeding with a consistent, fast milk flow, however, increases risk of overfeeding, overweight, and obesity.[9] If babies are routinely overfed by bottle during the day (a common issue for employed parents), too much milk during their daylight hours can leave babies less interested in nursing at night. This major alteration in normal infant feeding patterns may decrease milk production and interfere with parents’ ability to keep their long-term milk production steady. If this happens, switching to paced bottle-feeding may help get nursing back on track.
Should you wake a sleeping baby? One size definitely does not fit all. As with most aspects of parenting, following a simple adage will never be right 100% of the time. You are the expert on your baby. If your approach is working for your family and enables you to meet your feeding goals, trust your instincts. On the other hand, if a practice doesn’t feel right or negatively affects you or your baby, it’s time to consider alternatives or to seek help.
References
1 Kellams, A., Harrel, C., Omage, S., et al. (2017). ABM Clinical Protocol #3: Supplementary feedings in the healthy term breastfed neonate, revised 2017. Breastfeeding Medicine, 12(3), 188-198.
2 WHO. (2009). WHO Child Growth Standards: Growth Velocity Based on Weight, Length and Head Circumference: Methods and Development. (2006/07/05 ed. Vol. 450). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
3 Benson, S. (2001). What is normal? A study of normal breastfeeding dyads during the first sixty hours of life. Breastfeeding Review, 9(1), 27-32.
4 Nommsen-Rivers, L. A., Heinig, M. J., Cohen, R. J., et al. (2008). Newborn wet and soiled diaper counts and timing of onset of lactation as indicators of breastfeeding inadequacy. Journal of Human Lactation, 24(1), 27-33.
5 Kent, J. C., Mitoulas, L. R., Cregan, M. D., et al. (2006). Volume and frequency of breastfeedings and fat content of breast milk throughout the day. Pediatrics, 117(3), e387-395.
6 Mohrbacher, N. (2011). The ‘Magic Number’ and long-term milk production. Clinical Lactation, 2(1), 15-18.
7 Aney, M. (1998). ‘BabyWise’ advice linked to dehydration, failure to thrive. AAP News, 14(4):21.
8 Ball, H. L., Douglas, P. S., Kulasinghe, K., et al. (2018). The Possums Infant Sleep Program: Parents’ perspectives on a novel parent-infant sleep intervention in Australia. Sleep Health, 4(6), 519-526.
9 Azad, M. B., Vehling, L., Chan, D., et al. (2018). Infant feeding and weight gain: Separating breast milk from breastfeeding and formula from food. Pediatrics, 142(4)
Perceptions, Experiences, and Outcomes of Lactation Support in the Workplace: A Systematic Literature Review
BackgroundDespite legislation requiring break time and a private space to express milk, variations exist in accommodations for breastfeeding employees in the United States.Research AimsWe aimed to describe employee and employer perceptions of and experiences with workplace lactation support in the United States and to identify research needed to inform workplace lactation support programs.MethodsWe searched Academic Search Complete, Business Search Complete, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PubMed, and PsycInfo for peer-reviewed articles published from 2009 to 2019 (n = 1638). We included 27 articles. Studies were categorized into four non-exclusive themes: (a) employee perceptions of and experiences with workplace lactation support; (b) employer reports of workplace lactation support; (c) association between workplace lactation support and business outcomes; and (d) association between workplace lactation support and breastfeeding outcomes.ResultsAnalyses of associations between lactation support at work and employee breastfeeding outcomes (n = 14, 52%), and employee perceptions of and experiences with lactation support at work (n = 14, 52%) were most common, followed by employer reports of lactation support (n = 3, 11%) and associations between lactation support at work and job satisfaction (n = 3, 11%). Results indicated that workplace lactation support varied by employer, and that employee perceptions of and experiences with workplace lactation support varied by demographic and employment characteristics. The use of cross-sectional designs, unvalidated instruments, and limited representation from women with low incomes and minorities were common study limitations.ConclusionsMore research is needed to learn about experiences of employers and low-income and minority women with workplace lactation support and associations with business-relevant outcomes.
New Protocol on Breast Cancer and Breastfeeding
Engaging African American Parents to Develop a Mobile Health Technology for Breastfeeding: KULEA-NET
BackgroundAfrican Americans breastfeed less than other groups, which has implications for health throughout the life course. Little is known about mobile health technologies to support breastfeeding.Research aimsThis study proceeded in two phases. The aim of Phase 1 was to identify ideal technological components and content of a mobile health intervention. The aim of Phase 2 was to determine the usability of a prototype, KULEA-NET, based on the Phase 1 findings.MethodsFor this mixed-methods study, we used community-based participatory research methods and user-centered technology design methods. We used open coding in NVivo 11 to organize data from focus groups and in-depth interviews, then we analyzed the data. We then developed a prototype and tested the prototype’s usability with the System Usability Scale. Fifty pregnant and postpartum African Americans from the District of Columbia participated.ResultsParticipants preferred an app with text messaging technology and identified areas for intervention: self-efficacy, parent-child attachment beliefs, social support, public breastfeeding and social desirability, and returning to work. Desired features included local resources, support person access, baby care logs, identification of public breastfeeding venues, and peer discussions. The System Usability Scale score was 73.8, which indicates above average usability.ConclusionsA mobile health technology like KULEA-NET can be used to meet the breastfeeding needs of African Americans, build social desirability, and complement traditional health care. The appeal of an African American-specific intervention is unclear. Responding to mixed feeding practices is challenging. KULEA-NET is a mobile breastfeeding intervention guided by the preferences of African American parents and offers promising usability metrics.
Message from the President
Validation of the Arabic version of the breastfeeding behavior questionnaire among Lebanese women
Breastfeeding, Human Milk Collection and Containers, and Human Milk Banking: Hot Topics During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Prelacteal feeding practices in Pakistan: a mixed-methods study
Dietary patterns and their association with breast milk macronutrient composition among lactating women
Are our babies off to a healthy start? The state of implementation of the Global strategy for infant and young child feeding in Europe
Implementation of the Reimbursement Cost of Human-Milk-Based Neonatal Therapy in Polish Health Care Service: Practical and Ethical Background
BackgroundA human-milk-based diet is the best option for nutritional therapy for preterm and/or sick newborns.Research aimThe study aims were to restructure the reimbursement rates to hospitals in Poland for infants’ tube feedings to favor the use of donor human milk over formula for newborns who required supplementation of expressed mother’s milk and evaluate the results of the financing change during the first year of implementation (2018).MethodsFinancial data from hospitals were collected (2015–2016) by the Human Milk Bank Foundation using a data sheet designed by the Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Tariff System. We used data to restructure the reimbursement rates to hospitals for infants’ tube feedings and implemented the changes in late 2017. The National Health Fund was requested to share reported data in 2018 concerning tube feeding services.ResultsMore than half (61%) of NICUs introduced human milk tube feeding for newborns. It was provided to participants (N = 5,530), most frequently to seriously ill preterm infants (66.6%). Of these infants, 2,323 were fed donor human milk. Only 1,925 newborns received formula tube feeding. However, there were large differences in frequency of services reported among various parts of the country.ConclusionsBased on our knowledge, Poland is the only European country where the reimbursement cost for human-milk-based nutritional therapy has been implemented in a manner intended to increase the quality of health care services for preterm newborns. Equal reimbursement for expressed mother’s milk and donor milk did not appear to cause overuse of donor milk based on our analysis of the 2018 data.